Search
Total
256 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-28043 | 1 Misp | 1 Misp | 2020-11-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| MISP through 2.4.133 allows SSRF in the REST client via the use_full_path parameter with an arbitrary URL. | |||||
| CVE-2020-7739 | 1 Phantomjs-seo Project | 1 Phantomjs-seo | 2020-10-22 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 8.2 HIGH |
| This affects all versions of package phantomjs-seo. It is possible for an attacker to craft a url that will be passed to a PhantomJS instance allowing for an SSRF attack. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15822 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Youtrack | 2020-10-22 | 7.5 HIGH | 7.3 HIGH |
| In JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.2.10514, SSRF is possible because URL filtering can be escaped. | |||||
| CVE-2020-7740 | 1 Node-pdf-generator Project | 1 Node-pdf-generator | 2020-10-19 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 8.2 HIGH |
| This affects all versions of package node-pdf-generator. Due to lack of user input validation and sanitization done to the content given to node-pdf-generator, it is possible for an attacker to craft a url that will be passed to an external server allowing an SSRF attack. | |||||
| CVE-2019-12632 | 1 Cisco | 1 Finesse | 2020-10-08 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in Cisco Finesse could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass access controls and conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability exists because the affected system does not properly validate user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to a user of the web application. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to access the system and perform unauthorized actions. | |||||
| CVE-2019-12633 | 1 Cisco | 1 Unified Contact Center Express | 2020-10-08 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in Cisco Unified Contact Center Express (Unified CCX) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass access controls and conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack on a targeted system. The vulnerability is due to improper validation of user-supplied input on the affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending the user of the web application a crafted request. If the request is processed, the attacker could access the system and perform unauthorized actions. | |||||
| CVE-2020-13309 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2020-09-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability was discovered in GitLab versions before 13.1.10, 13.2.8 and 13.3.4. GitLab was vulnerable to a blind SSRF attack through the repository mirroring feature. | |||||
| CVE-2020-9298 | 1 Spinnaker | 1 Orca | 2020-08-31 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The Spinnaker template resolution functionality is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), which allows an attacker to send requests on behalf of Spinnaker potentially leading to sensitive data disclosure. | |||||
| CVE-2020-14296 | 1 Redhat | 1 Cloudforms Management Engine | 2020-08-12 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 7.1 HIGH |
| Red Hat CloudForms 4.7 and 5 was vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) flaw. With the access to add Ansible Tower provider, an attacker could scan and attack systems from the internal network which are not normally accessible. | |||||
| CVE-2020-13295 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Runner | 2020-08-12 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| For GitLab Runner before 13.0.12, 13.1.6, 13.2.3, by replacing dockerd with a malicious server, the Shared Runner is susceptible to SSRF. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15823 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Youtrack | 2020-08-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.2.8873 is vulnerable to SSRF in the Workflow component. | |||||
| CVE-2020-13970 | 1 Shopware | 1 Shopware | 2020-07-31 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Shopware before 6.2.3 is vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in its "Mediabrowser upload by URL" feature. This allows an authenticated user to send HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, and SFTP requests on behalf of the Shopware platform server. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15879 | 1 Bitwarden | 1 Server | 2020-07-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Bitwarden Server 1.35.1 allows SSRF because it does not consider certain IPv6 addresses (ones beginning with fc, fd, fe, or ff, and the :: address) and certain IPv4 addresses (0.0.0.0/8, 127.0.0.0/8, and 169.254.0.0/16). | |||||
| CVE-2020-8205 | 1 Transloadit | 1 Uppy | 2020-07-23 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The uppy npm package < 1.13.2 and < 2.0.0-alpha.5 is vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability, which allows an attacker to scan local or external networks or otherwise interact with internal systems. | |||||
| CVE-2017-5617 | 2 Debian, Kitfox | 2 Debian Linux, Svg Salamander | 2020-07-08 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| The SVG Salamander (aka svgSalamander) library, when used in a web application, allows remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via an xlink:href attribute in an SVG file. | |||||
| CVE-2020-13650 | 1 Digdash | 1 Digdash | 2020-06-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in DigDash 2018R2 before p20200210 and 2019R1 before p20200210. The login page is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) that allows use of the application as a proxy. Sent to an external server, a forged request discloses application credentials. For a request to an internal component, the request is blind, but through the error message it's possible to determine whether the request targeted a open service. | |||||
| CVE-2020-12725 | 1 Redash | 1 Redash | 2020-06-22 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| Havoc Research discovered an authenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the "JSON" data source of Redash open-source 8.0.0 and prior. Possibly, other connectors are affected. The SSRF is potent and provides a lot of flexibility in terms of being able to craft HTTP requests e.g., by adding headers, selecting any HTTP verb, etc. | |||||
| CVE-2020-9643 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2020-06-15 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5 and earlier have a server-side request forgery (ssrf) vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to sensitive information disclosure. | |||||
| CVE-2020-9645 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2020-06-15 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5 and earlier have a blind server-side request forgery (ssrf) vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to sensitive information disclosure. | |||||
| CVE-2020-4529 | 1 Ibm | 1 Maximo Asset Management | 2020-06-09 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.6.0 and 7.6.1 is vulnerable to server side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 182713. | |||||
| CVE-2014-8943 | 1 Piwigo | 1 Lexiglot | 2020-06-02 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Lexiglot through 2014-11-20 allows SSRF via the admin.php?page=projects svn_url parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2017-17697 | 1 Linuxfoundation | 1 Harbor | 2020-04-01 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 8.6 HIGH |
| The Ping() function in ui/api/target.go in Harbor through 1.3.0-rc4 has SSRF via the endpoint parameter to /api/targets/ping. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3769 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2020-03-27 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5 and earlier have a server-side request forgery (ssrf) vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to sensitive information disclosure. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8134 | 1 Ghost | 1 Ghost | 2020-03-26 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Ghost CMS < 3.10.0 allows an attacker to scan local or external network or otherwise interact with internal systems. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13121 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2020-03-11 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in GitLab Enterprise Edition 10.6 through 12.0.2. The GitHub project integration was vulnerable to an SSRF vulnerability which allowed an attacker to make requests to local network resources. It has Incorrect Access Control. | |||||
| CVE-2019-19835 | 1 Ruckuswireless | 17 C110, E510, H320 and 14 more | 2020-01-27 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| SSRF in AjaxRestrictedCmdStat in zap in Ruckus Wireless Unleashed through 200.7.10.102.64 allows a remote denial of service via the server attribute to the tools/_rcmdstat.jsp URI. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1925 | 1 Apache | 1 Olingo | 2020-01-15 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Apache Olingo versions 4.0.0 to 4.7.0 provide the AsyncRequestWrapperImpl class which reads a URL from the Location header, and then sends a GET or DELETE request to this URL. It may allow to implement a SSRF attack. If an attacker tricks a client to connect to a malicious server, the server can make the client call any URL including internal resources which are not directly accessible by the attacker. | |||||
| CVE-2019-19261 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2020-01-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| GitLab Enterprise Edition (EE) 6.7 and later through 12.5 allows SSRF. | |||||
| CVE-2019-19999 | 1 Halo | 1 Halo | 2020-01-08 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| Halo before 1.2.0-beta.1 allows Server Side Template Injection (SSTI) because TemplateClassResolver.SAFER_RESOLVER is not used in the FreeMarker configuration. | |||||
| CVE-2018-20499 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2020-01-07 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition before 11.x before 11.4.13, 11.5.x before 11.5.6, and 11.6.x before 11.6.1. It allows SSRF. | |||||
| CVE-2019-18379 | 1 Symantec | 1 Messaging Gateway | 2019-12-13 | 7.5 HIGH | 7.3 HIGH |
| Symantec Messaging Gateway, prior to 10.7.3, may be susceptible to a server-side request forgery (SSRF) exploit, which is a type of issue that can let an attacker send crafted requests from the backend server of a vulnerable web application or access services available through the loopback interface. | |||||
| CVE-2019-8156 | 1 Magento | 1 Magento | 2019-11-08 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.10, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.3 or 2.3.2-p1. An authenticated user with admin privileges to modify store configurations can manipulate the connector api endpoint to enable remote code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2019-8151 | 1 Magento | 1 Magento | 2019-11-07 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.10, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.3 or 2.3.2-p1. An authenticated user with admin privileges to manipulate shippment settings can execute arbitrary code through server-side request forgery due to unsafe handling of a carrier gateway. | |||||
| CVE-2019-17400 | 1 Universal Office Converter Project | 1 Universal Office Converter | 2019-10-23 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The unoconv package before 0.9 mishandles untrusted pathnames, leading to SSRF and local file inclusion. | |||||
| CVE-2017-18638 | 1 Graphite Project | 1 Graphite | 2019-10-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| send_email in graphite-web/webapp/graphite/composer/views.py in Graphite through 1.1.5 is vulnerable to SSRF. The vulnerable SSRF endpoint can be used by an attacker to have the Graphite web server request any resource. The response to this SSRF request is encoded into an image file and then sent to an e-mail address that can be supplied by the attacker. Thus, an attacker can exfiltrate any information. | |||||
| CVE-2016-7051 | 1 Fasterxml | 1 Jackson-dataformat-xml | 2019-10-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 8.6 HIGH |
| XmlMapper in the Jackson XML dataformat component (aka jackson-dataformat-xml) before 2.7.8 and 2.8.x before 2.8.4 allows remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via vectors related to a DTD. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11897 | 1 Bosch | 2 Iot Gateway Software, Prosyst Mbs Sdk | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 8.6 HIGH |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the backup & restore functionality in earlier versions than ProSyst mBS SDK 8.2.6 and Bosch IoT Gateway Software 9.3.0 allows a remote attacker to forge GET requests to arbitrary URLs. In addition, this could potentially allow an attacker to read sensitive zip files from the local server. | |||||
| CVE-2018-7516 | 1 Geutebrueck | 4 G-cam\/efd-2250, G-cam\/efd-2250 Firmware, Topfd-2125 and 1 more | 2019-10-09 | 7.5 HIGH | 7.3 HIGH |
| A server-side request forgery vulnerability has been identified in Geutebruck G-Cam/EFD-2250 Version 1.12.0.4 and Topline TopFD-2125 Version 3.15.1 IP cameras, which could lead to proxied network scans. | |||||
| CVE-2019-15033 | 1 Pydio | 1 Pydio | 2019-09-20 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 7.7 HIGH |
| Pydio 6.0.8 allows Authenticated SSRF during a Remote Link Feature download. An attacker can specify an intranet address in the file parameter to index.php, when sending a file to a remote server, as demonstrated by the file=http%3A%2F%2F192.168.1.2 substring. | |||||
| CVE-2019-15728 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2019-09-18 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition 10.1 through 12.2.1. Protections against SSRF attacks on the Kubernetes integration are insufficient, which could have allowed an attacker to request any local network resource accessible from the GitLab server. | |||||
| CVE-2019-15730 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2019-09-18 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition 8.14 through 12.2.1. The Jira integration contains a SSRF vulnerability as a result of a bypass of the current protection mechanisms against this type of attack, which would allow sending requests to any resources accessible in the local network by the GitLab server. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6793 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2019-09-10 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.0 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in GitLab Enterprise Edition before 11.5.8, 11.6.x before 11.6.6, and 11.7.x before 11.7.1. The Jira integration feature is vulnerable to an unauthenticated blind SSRF issue. | |||||
| CVE-2019-12959 | 1 Zohocorp | 1 Manageengine Assetexplorer | 2019-08-16 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) exists in Zoho ManageEngine AssetExplorer 6.2.0 and before for the ClientUtilServlet servlet via a URL in a parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2019-7911 | 1 Magento | 1 Magento | 2019-08-09 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Magento Open Source prior to 1.9.4.2, and Magento Commerce prior to 1.14.4.2, Magento 2.1 prior to 2.1.18, Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.9, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.2. This can be exploited by an authenticated user with access to the admin panel to manipulate system configuration and execute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2019-7913 | 1 Magento | 1 Magento | 2019-08-07 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Magento 2.1 prior to 2.1.18, Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.9, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.2. This can be exploited by an authenticated user with admin privileges to manipulate shipment methods to execute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2019-7892 | 1 Magento | 1 Magento | 2019-08-07 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Magento 2.1 prior to 2.1.18, Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.9, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.2. An authenticated user with administrator privileges to access shipment settings can execute arbitrary code via server-side request forgery. | |||||
| CVE-2019-7923 | 1 Magento | 1 Magento | 2019-08-07 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Magento 2.1 prior to 2.1.18, Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.9, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.2. This can be exploited by authenticated user with admin privileges to manipulate shipment settings to execute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2019-9187 | 1 Ikiwiki | 1 Ikiwiki | 2019-07-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| ikiwiki before 3.20170111.1 and 3.2018x and 3.2019x before 3.20190228 allows SSRF via the aggregate plugin. The impact also includes reading local files via file: URIs. | |||||
| CVE-2019-9621 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration Server | 2019-06-06 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Zimbra Collaboration Suite before 8.6 patch 13, 8.7.x before 8.7.11 patch 10, and 8.8.x before 8.8.10 patch 7 or 8.8.x before 8.8.11 patch 3 allows SSRF via the ProxyServlet component. | |||||
| CVE-2017-5643 | 1 Apache | 1 Camel | 2019-05-24 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| Apache Camel's Validation Component is vulnerable against SSRF via remote DTDs and XXE. | |||||