Search
Total
177 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-42637 | 1 Printerlogic | 1 Web Stack | 2022-02-08 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| PrinterLogic Web Stack versions 19.1.1.13 SP9 and below use user-controlled input to craft a URL, resulting in a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2022-0086 | 1 Transloadit | 1 Uppy | 2022-01-08 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| uppy is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) | |||||
| CVE-2021-39303 | 1 Jamf | 1 Jamf | 2021-12-16 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The server in Jamf Pro before 10.32.0 has an SSRF vulnerability, aka PI-006352. NOTE: Jamf Nation will also publish an article about this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3395 | 1 Atlassian | 2 Confluence, Confluence Server | 2021-12-13 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The WebDAV endpoint in Atlassian Confluence Server and Data Center before version 6.6.7 (the fixed version for 6.6.x), from version 6.7.0 before 6.8.5 (the fixed version for 6.8.x), and from version 6.9.0 before 6.9.3 (the fixed version for 6.9.x) allows remote attackers to send arbitrary HTTP and WebDAV requests from a Confluence Server or Data Center instance via Server-Side Request Forgery. | |||||
| CVE-2021-40091 | 1 Squaredup | 1 Squaredup | 2021-12-07 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An SSRF issue was discovered in SquaredUp for SCOM 5.2.1.6654. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22049 | 1 Vmware | 1 Vcenter Server | 2021-11-30 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The vSphere Web Client (FLEX/Flash) contains an SSRF (Server Side Request Forgery) vulnerability in the vSAN Web Client (vSAN UI) plug-in. A malicious actor with network access to port 443 on vCenter Server may exploit this issue by accessing a URL request outside of vCenter Server or accessing an internal service. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41259 | 1 Nim-lang | 1 Nim | 2021-11-17 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Nim is a systems programming language with a focus on efficiency, expressiveness, and elegance. In affected versions the uri.parseUri function which may be used to validate URIs accepts null bytes in the input URI. This behavior could be used to bypass URI validation. For example: parseUri("http://localhost\0hello").hostname is set to "localhost\0hello". Additionally, httpclient.getContent accepts null bytes in the input URL and ignores any data after the first null byte. Example: getContent("http://localhost\0hello") makes a request to localhost:80. An attacker can use a null bytes to bypass the check and mount a SSRF attack. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22958 | 1 Concretecms | 1 Concrete Cms | 2021-11-01 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability was found in concrete5 < 8.5.5 that allowed a decimal notation encoded IP address to bypass the limitations in place for localhost allowing interaction with local services. Impact can vary depending on services exposed.CVSSv2.0 AV:A/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N | |||||
| CVE-2020-21653 | 1 Myucms Project | 1 Myucms | 2021-10-15 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Myucms v2.2.1 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) in the component \controller\index.php, which can be exploited via the sj() method. | |||||
| CVE-2021-42091 | 1 Zammad | 1 Zammad | 2021-10-14 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Zammad before 4.1.1. SSRF can occur via GitHub or GitLab integration. | |||||
| CVE-2021-33690 | 1 Sap | 1 Netweaver Development Infrastructure | 2021-09-28 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 9.9 CRITICAL |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been detected in the SAP NetWeaver Development Infrastructure Component Build Service versions - 7.11, 7.20, 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, 7.50The SAP NetWeaver Development Infrastructure Component Build Service allows a threat actor who has access to the server to perform proxy attacks on server by sending crafted queries. Due to this, the threat actor could completely compromise sensitive data residing on the Server and impact its availability.Note: The impact of this vulnerability depends on whether SAP NetWeaver Development Infrastructure (NWDI) runs on the intranet or internet. The CVSS score reflects the impact considering the worst-case scenario that it runs on the internet. | |||||
| CVE-2021-35209 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2021-09-20 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in ProxyServlet.java in the /proxy servlet in Zimbra Collaboration Suite 8.8 before 8.8.15 Patch 23 and 9.x before 9.0.0 Patch 16. The value of the X-Host header overwrites the value of the Host header in proxied requests. The value of X-Host header is not checked against the whitelist of hosts Zimbra is allowed to proxy to (the zimbraProxyAllowedDomains setting). | |||||
| CVE-2021-32682 | 1 Std42 | 1 Elfinder | 2021-09-16 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| elFinder is an open-source file manager for web, written in JavaScript using jQuery UI. Several vulnerabilities affect elFinder 2.1.58. These vulnerabilities can allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code and commands on the server hosting the elFinder PHP connector, even with minimal configuration. The issues were patched in version 2.1.59. As a workaround, ensure the connector is not exposed without authentication. | |||||
| CVE-2021-27905 | 1 Apache | 1 Solr | 2021-09-16 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The ReplicationHandler (normally registered at "/replication" under a Solr core) in Apache Solr has a "masterUrl" (also "leaderUrl" alias) parameter that is used to designate another ReplicationHandler on another Solr core to replicate index data into the local core. To prevent a SSRF vulnerability, Solr ought to check these parameters against a similar configuration it uses for the "shards" parameter. Prior to this bug getting fixed, it did not. This problem affects essentially all Solr versions prior to it getting fixed in 8.8.2. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39497 | 1 Eyoucms | 1 Eyoucms | 2021-09-14 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| eyoucms 1.5.4 lacks sanitization of input data, allowing an attacker to inject a url to trigger blind SSRF via the saveRemote() function. | |||||
| CVE-2021-24472 | 1 Qantumthemes | 2 Kentharadio, Onair2 | 2021-08-27 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The OnAir2 WordPress theme before 3.9.9.2 and QT KenthaRadio WordPress plugin before 2.0.2 have exposed proxy functionality to unauthenticated users, sending requests to this proxy functionality will have the web server fetch and display the content from any URI, this would allow for SSRF (Server Side Request Forgery) and RFI (Remote File Inclusion) vulnerabilities on the website. | |||||
| CVE-2021-37353 | 1 Nagios | 1 Nagios Xi Docker Wizard | 2021-08-24 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Nagios XI Docker Wizard before version 1.1.3 is vulnerable to SSRF due to improper sanitation in table_population.php. | |||||
| CVE-2020-24142 | 1 Ninjateam | 1 Video Downloader For Tiktok | 2021-07-10 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Server-side request forgery in the Video Downloader for TikTok (aka downloader-tiktok) plugin 1.3 for WordPress lets an attacker send crafted requests from the back-end server of a vulnerable web application via the njt-tk-download-video parameter. It can help identify open ports, local network hosts and execute command on services | |||||
| CVE-2020-24148 | 1 Mooveagency | 1 Import Xml And Rss Feeds | 2021-07-10 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Server-side request forgery (SSRF) in the Import XML and RSS Feeds (import-xml-feed) plugin 2.0.1 for WordPress via the data parameter in a moove_read_xml action. | |||||
| CVE-2021-32639 | 1 Nsa | 1 Emissary | 2021-07-06 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 9.9 CRITICAL |
| Emissary is a P2P-based, data-driven workflow engine. Emissary version 6.4.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). In particular, the `RegisterPeerAction` endpoint and the `AddChildDirectoryAction` endpoint are vulnerable to SSRF. This vulnerability may lead to credential leaks. Emissary version 7.0 contains a patch. As a workaround, disable network access to Emissary from untrusted sources. | |||||
| CVE-2021-31531 | 1 Zohocorp | 1 Manageengine Servicedesk Plus Msp | 2021-07-02 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Zoho ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus MSP before 10521 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). | |||||
| CVE-2021-22175 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2021-06-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| When requests to the internal network for webhooks are enabled, a server-side request forgery vulnerability in GitLab affecting all versions starting from 10.5 was possible to exploit for an unauthenticated attacker even on a GitLab instance where registration is disabled | |||||
| CVE-2020-15377 | 1 Broadcom | 1 Sannav | 2021-06-11 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Webtools in Brocade SANnav before version 2.1.1 allows unauthenticated users to make requests to arbitrary hosts due to a misconfiguration; this is commonly referred to as Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). | |||||
| CVE-2021-33181 | 1 Synology | 1 Video Station | 2021-06-10 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in webapi component in Synology Video Station before 2.4.10-1632 allows remote authenticated users to send arbitrary request to intranet resources via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2021-30108 | 1 Feehi | 1 Feehi Cms | 2021-05-28 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Feehi CMS 2.1.1 is affected by a Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. When the user modifies the HTTP Referer header to any url, the server can make a request to it. | |||||
| CVE-2017-17674 | 1 Bmc | 1 Remedy Mid-tier | 2021-05-25 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| BMC Remedy Mid Tier 9.1SP3 is affected by remote and local file inclusion. Due to the lack of restrictions on what can be targeted, the system can be vulnerable to attacks such as system fingerprinting, internal port scanning, Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF), or remote code execution (RCE). | |||||
| CVE-2021-29475 | 1 Hedgedoc | 1 Hedgedoc | 2021-05-14 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| HedgeDoc (formerly known as CodiMD) is an open-source collaborative markdown editor. An attacker is able to receive arbitrary files from the file system when exporting a note to PDF. Since the code injection has to take place as note content, there fore this exploit requires the attackers ability to modify a note. This will affect all instances, which have pdf export enabled. This issue has been fixed by https://github.com/hedgedoc/hedgedoc/commit/c1789474020a6d668d616464cb2da5e90e123f65 and is available in version 1.5.0. Starting the CodiMD/HedgeDoc instance with `CMD_ALLOW_PDF_EXPORT=false` or set `"allowPDFExport": false` in config.json can mitigate this issue for those who cannot upgrade. This exploit works because while PhantomJS doesn't actually render the `file:///` references to the PDF file itself, it still uses them internally, and exfiltration is possible, and easy through JavaScript rendering. The impact is pretty bad, as the attacker is able to read the CodiMD/HedgeDoc `config.json` file as well any other files on the filesystem. Even though the suggested Docker deploy option doesn't have many interesting files itself, the `config.json` still often contains sensitive information, database credentials, and maybe OAuth secrets among other things. | |||||
| CVE-2021-29145 | 1 Arubanetworks | 1 Clearpass | 2021-05-10 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A remote server side request forgery (SSRF) remote code execution vulnerability was discovered in Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager version(s) prior to 6.9.5, 6.8.9, 6.7.14-HF1. Aruba has released patches for Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager that address this security vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15152 | 1 Ftp-srv Project | 1 Ftp-srv | 2021-05-05 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| ftp-srv is an npm package which is a modern and extensible FTP server designed to be simple yet configurable. In ftp-srv before versions 2.19.6, 3.1.2, and 4.3.4 are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery. The PORT command allows arbitrary IPs which can be used to cause the server to make a connection elsewhere. A possible workaround is blocking the PORT through the configuration. This issue is fixed in version2 2.19.6, 3.1.2, and 4.3.4. More information can be found on the linked advisory. | |||||
| CVE-2020-35313 | 1 Wondercms | 1 Wondercms | 2021-04-23 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the addCustomThemePluginRepository function in index.php in WonderCMS 3.1.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted URL to the theme/plugin installer. | |||||
| CVE-2021-1627 | 1 Salesforce | 1 Mule | 2021-04-01 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| MuleSoft is aware of a Server Side Request Forgery vulnerability affecting certain versions of a Mule runtime component that may affect both CloudHub and on-premise customers. This affects: Mule 3.8.x,3.9.x,4.x runtime released before February 2, 2021. | |||||
| CVE-2021-26715 | 1 Mitreid | 1 Connect | 2021-03-29 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| The OpenID Connect server implementation for MITREid Connect through 1.3.3 contains a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. The vulnerability arises due to unsafe usage of the logo_uri parameter in the Dynamic Client Registration request. An unauthenticated attacker can make a HTTP request from the vulnerable server to any address in the internal network and obtain its response (which might, for example, have a JavaScript payload for resultant XSS). The issue can be exploited to bypass network boundaries, obtain sensitive data, or attack other hosts in the internal network. | |||||
| CVE-2020-23534 | 1 Masterlab | 1 Masterlab | 2021-03-03 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Upgrade.php of gopeak masterlab 2.1.5, via the 'source' parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2021-27670 | 1 Appspace | 1 Appspace | 2021-03-02 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Appspace 6.2.4 allows SSRF via the api/v1/core/proxy/jsonprequest url parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2021-27329 | 1 Frendi | 1 Frendica | 2021-02-26 | 10.0 HIGH | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| Friendica 2021.01 allows SSRF via parse_url?binurl= for DNS lookups or HTTP requests to arbitrary domain names. | |||||
| CVE-2021-27103 | 1 Accellion | 1 Fta | 2021-02-17 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Accellion FTA 9_12_411 and earlier is affected by SSRF via a crafted POST request to wmProgressstat.html. The fixed version is FTA_9_12_416 and later. | |||||
| CVE-2020-24881 | 1 Osticket | 1 Osticket | 2021-01-30 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| SSRF exists in osTicket before 1.14.3, where an attacker can add malicious file to server or perform port scanning. | |||||
| CVE-2020-35712 | 3 Esri, Linux, Microsoft | 3 Arcgis Server, Linux Kernel, Windows | 2020-12-30 | 9.3 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Esri ArcGIS Server before 10.8 is vulnerable to SSRF in some configurations. | |||||
| CVE-2020-28360 | 1 Private-ip Project | 1 Private-ip | 2020-12-08 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Insufficient RegEx in private-ip npm package v1.0.5 and below insufficiently filters reserved IP ranges resulting in indeterminate SSRF. An attacker can perform a large range of requests to ARIN reserved IP ranges, resulting in an indeterminable number of critical attack vectors, allowing remote attackers to request server-side resources or potentially execute arbitrary code through various SSRF techniques. | |||||
| CVE-2018-10511 | 1 Trendmicro | 1 Control Manager | 2020-12-08 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| A vulnerability in Trend Micro Control Manager (versions 6.0 and 7.0) could allow an attacker to conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack on vulnerable installations. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15297 | 1 Bitdefender | 1 Update Server | 2020-11-24 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Insufficient validation in the Bitdefender Update Server and BEST Relay components of Bitdefender Endpoint Security Tools versions prior to 6.6.20.294 allows an unprivileged attacker to bypass the in-place mitigations and interact with hosts on the network. This issue affects: Bitdefender Update Server versions prior to 6.6.20.294. | |||||
| CVE-2020-27197 | 2 Eclecticiq, Libtaxii Project | 2 Opentaxii, Libtaxii | 2020-10-27 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| ** DISPUTED ** TAXII libtaxii through 1.1.117, as used in EclecticIQ OpenTAXII through 0.2.0 and other products, allows SSRF via an initial http:// substring to the parse method, even when the no_network setting is used for the XML parser. NOTE: the vendor points out that the parse method "wraps the lxml library" and that this may be an issue to "raise ... to the lxml group." | |||||
| CVE-2020-25466 | 1 Crmeb | 1 Crmeb | 2020-10-27 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A SSRF vulnerability exists in the downloadimage interface of CRMEB 3.0, which can remotely download arbitrary files on the server and remotely execute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2020-26948 | 1 Msf Emby Project | 1 Msf Emby | 2020-10-26 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Emby Server before 4.5.0 allows SSRF via the Items/RemoteSearch/Image ImageURL parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2017-12905 | 1 Vebto | 1 Pixie - Image Editor | 2020-10-02 | 7.5 HIGH | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| Server Side Request Forgery vulnerability in Vebto Pixie Image Editor 1.4 and 1.7 allows remote attackers to disclose information or execute arbitrary code via the url parameter to Launderer.php. | |||||
| CVE-2019-17670 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2020-09-11 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| WordPress before 5.2.4 has a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability because Windows paths are mishandled during certain validation of relative URLs. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14721 | 4 Debian, Fasterxml, Oracle and 1 more | 12 Debian Linux, Jackson-databind, Banking Platform and 9 more | 2020-08-31 | 7.5 HIGH | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.7 might allow remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks by leveraging failure to block the axis2-jaxws class from polymorphic deserialization. | |||||
| CVE-2019-4203 | 1 Ibm | 1 Api Connect | 2020-08-24 | 9.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| IBM API Connect 5.0.0.0 and 5.0.8.6 Developer Portal can be exploited by app developers to download arbitrary files from the host OS and potentially carry out SSRF attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 159124. | |||||
| CVE-2019-18394 | 1 Igniterealtime | 1 Openfire | 2020-08-07 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in FaviconServlet.java in Ignite Realtime Openfire through 4.4.2 allows attackers to send arbitrary HTTP GET requests. | |||||
| CVE-2020-14056 | 1 Monstaftp | 1 Monsta Ftp | 2020-07-08 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Monsta FTP 2.10.1 or below is prone to a server-side request forgery vulnerability due to insufficient restriction of the web fetch functionality. This allows attackers to read arbitrary local files and interact with arbitrary third-party services. | |||||